Best Practices
Best Practices
1. Configuration Management
✅ DO:
- Use descriptive names:
config/gpt4_vs_claude_alignment.yaml - Include version in benchmark config for tracking
- Add comments in YAML explaining parameter choices
- Keep separate configs for experiments vs. production
❌ DON'T:
- Overwrite configs without versioning
- Use generic names like
config1.yaml - Hard-code parameters in source code
2. Reproducibility
✅ DO:
- Set temperature to 0.0 for deterministic results
- Use at least 3-5 runs for reliable statistics
- Save all configurations in version control
- Specify exact model names (e.g.,
gpt-4-0613, not justgpt-4) - Record timestamps and config hashes in results
❌ DON'T:
- Use temperature > 0 without documenting why
- Run benchmarks only once
- Delete old result files
- Use "latest" model versions without recording specifics
3. Cost Management
✅ DO:
- Start with 1-2 questions for testing
- Use cheaper models (gpt-3.5-turbo) for development
- Monitor API usage dashboards
- Cache results to avoid re-running
- Set
max_tokensappropriately for each metric
❌ DON'T:
- Run full benchmarks during development
- Use GPT-4 for all testing
- Ignore rate limits
- Re-run unnecessarily
4. Data Quality
✅ DO:
- Validate JSON schemas before running
- Ensure source_material paths exist
- Review questions for well-formedness
- Test with small dataset first
- Include learning objectives when available
❌ DON'T:
- Skip validation steps
- Assume JSON is well-formed
- Run benchmarks on untested data
5. Metric Selection
✅ DO:
- Choose metrics relevant to your research question
- Start with core metrics (alignment, clarity, cognitive level)
- Create domain-specific metrics for specialized content
- Test metric prompts manually before automation
- Document metric rationale in config comments
❌ DON'T:
- Enable all metrics without purpose
- Use metrics inappropriate for question type
- Deploy untested custom metrics
6. Result Interpretation
✅ DO:
- Look at trends across multiple quizzes
- Check for consistency (low std dev = reliable)
- Cross-validate with multiple evaluators
- Review outliers and raw LLM responses
- Consider context (domain, audience, objectives)
❌ DON'T:
- Over-interpret single data points
- Ignore high variance warnings
- Trust one evaluator blindly
- Compare scores across different metrics